RE: Additional Information update

Guy Perea Presidential Elector President of The United States

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "guy perea" <guyperea1@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 27, 2014 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: Additional Information
To: "Linda Ibarez-Hernandez" <libarez@venterraliving.com>
Cc:

Yea you work for a leasing Company and Steering of Elders are under response on Image of Document I sent and who I am is in written details.

Guy Perea Presidential Elector President of The United States

On Aug 27, 2014 2:01 PM, "Linda Ibarez-Hernandez" <libarez@venterraliving.com> wrote:

Hi!

Was this information supposed to be for me?
I'm sorry I have no knowledge of why you sent me this, could you please clarify?

Thank you,

Linda Ibarez- Leasing - Calais Park Lofts & Apartments - Venterra Realty

5800 Calais Lane / St. Petersburg, FL 33714

p: (727) 526-4663 f: (727) 526-0416

libarez@venterraliving.com www.venterraliving.com

A Better Way of Living

________________________________________
From: guy perea [guyperea1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:54 AM
To: Linda Ibarez-Hernandez
Subject: Re: Additional Information

You will note there is a investigation concerning Disfranchised of
voters in Florida due lack of decease Corpus in to authorization the
removal of Right to Housing in further information to me be in
compliance of law; So we can have a understanding in The following is
based on Right to Vote which based on our Jurisdiction at time of
registration to Act as a Citizen such as a Housing if such is denied
then a violation of the Right to Liberty and such as I am a Registered
voter and seal Certificate then Compliance to your conventional view
of Pinealls County and State of Florida shall come inline of
following:
The ratification  of  this  Amendment  was  the  outcome  of
increasing popular  dissatisfaction with  the  operation  of  the
originally established  method of  electing  Senators.    As  the
franchise became  exercisable by  greater numbers  of people, the
belief became  widespread that  Senators ought  to  be  popularly
elected in  the same  manner as  Representatives.   Acceptance of
this idea  was fostered  by the mounting accumulation of evidence
of the  practical disadvantages  and malpractices  attendant upon
legislative selection,  such  as  deadlocks  within  legislatures
resulting  in   vacancies  remaining   unfilled  for  substantial
intervals, the  influencing of  legislative selection  by corrupt
political  organizations  and  special  interest  groups  through
purchase of  legislative seats,  and the  neglect  of  duties  by
legislators as  a consequence  of protracted  electoral contests.
Prior  to   ratification,  however,  many  States  had  perfected
arrangements calculated  to  afford  the  voters  more  effective
control over  the selection of Senators.  State laws were amended
so as  to enable  voters participating  in primary  elections  to
designate their  preference for  one of  several party candidates
for a  senatorial seat,  and  nominations  unofficially  effected
thereby were  transmitted to  the legislature.    Although  their
action rested  upon no  stronger  foundation  that  [sic]  common
understanding, the  legislatures generally  elected  the  winning
candidate of the majority, and, indeed, in two States, candidates
for legislative  seats  were  required  to  promise  to  support,
without regard  to party  ties, the  senatorial candidate polling
the most  votes.   As a  result of such developments, at least 29
States by  1912, one  year before  ratification, were  nominating
Senators  on   a  popular  basis,  and,  as  a  consequence,  the
constitutional discretion  of the  legislatures had  been reduced
to little more than that retained by presidential electors./1

    Very shortly after ratification it was established that if a
person possessed  the qualifications  requisite for  voting for a
Senator, his  right to  vote for  such an officer was not derived
merely from  the constitution and laws of the State in which they
are chosen  but had  its foundation  in the  Constitution of  the
United States./2   Consistent  with  this  view,  federal  courts
declared that  when local  party authorities,  acting pursuant to
regulations prescribed  by a  party's state  executive committee,
refused to  permit a ....., on account of his ...., to vote in a
primary to select candidates for the office of U.S. Senator, they
deprived him  of a  right secured  to him by the Constitution and
laws, in  violation of this Amendment./3  An Illinois statute, on
the other  hand, which  required that  a petition to form, and to
nominate candidates  or, a  new political  party be  signed by at
least 25,000  voters from  at least  50 counties  was held not to
impair any right under the Seventeenth Amendment, notwithstanding
that 52  percent of  the State's  voters were  residents  of  one
county, 87  percent were  residents of  49 counties,  and only 13
percent resided in the 53 least populous counties./4

On Friday, July 11, 2014, guy perea <guyperea1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The conviction was more then 10 year's it's been since 1999 the year is 2014 that's today and the since 1999 is 15 years
>
> Guy Perea Presidential Elector President of The United States
>
> On Jul 11, 2014 4:58 PM, "Cori Stover - The Reserve at Lake Pointe
Well, just so there is no misunderstanding's, our qualifications when
it comes to criminal background is "Any felony conviction within 10
years will result in immediate rejection of application for residency.
Your application for residency will be also rejected for any of the
following criminal related reasons, regardless of whether or not jail
time was served or adjudication was withheld or time limits,
>>
>> -Any crime against a person or a persons property
>>
>> -any prostitution related conviction
>>
>> -Any sex related conviction
>>
>> -A listing as a sexual predator or offender
>>
>> -Any terrorist related conviction
>>
>> -Any cruelty to animals related conviction
>>
>> If any of those apply to the charges from 1999, then unfortuneately I highly reccommend not applying. If not, then I'd be happy to assist you with any further questions.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Cori
>> How long ago was and what was the felony for? That may be the only thing that would hold you up. We have no problem with the small dog, as long as it's under 30lbs, it's a one-time pet fee of $300. We also offer lease terms up to as long as 18 months.
>>
>> Cori
>>
>>
>>
>> Click an option
>> below to respond
>>
>>
>>
>> 5800 Lynn Lake Drive South - St. Petersburg, FL 33712
>> Phone: Call Us - Fax: (727) 866-3979
>>
>>
>>
>> View disclaimer - Click here to unsubscribe
>>
>> From: guyperea1@gmail.com
>> To: reservelakepointefl@researchapartments.com
>> Sent: 7/11/2014 10:07:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: The Reserve at Lake Pointe Apartments is pet friendly
>>
>> I have no Credit but a good income at two and half times they want 30,000 in total investment but with Retirement VA and Social Security and Stocks I have that also I am a pass felon and Discharged from State of California and Register with FDLE and County so I'm in full Compliance also I have a small pet I live alone I'm 64 year's old on Medicare and VA if I get sick and looking for a lease for at least a year monthly 600 to 650 let me know what you have

On 8/27/14, libarez@venterraliving.com <libarez@venterraliving.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your interest in Calais Park Lofts.
> Please find attached information we discussed.
>
> Regards,
> Linda Ibarez-Hernandez
>
> Find us on [image: Facebook]  at www.facebook.com/VenterraRealty.
>
> Check out our YouTube Channel at www.youtube.com/VenterraRealty.
>
> This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law or may constitute attorney work product. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or
> (ii) delete this message immediately if an electronic communication.


--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata Weatherdata http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
NAS BLYND
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nas-blynd
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication Commission
http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/  Ambassador Chevy Chase;
Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain  legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal; https://twitter.com/ptusss
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if an electronic communication.