Holiday

Friday, October 18, 2013

The "children of fornications" in Book Julius Africanus Afica is the father of Christian chronography of Zachary in flight of Wissenschaft

In the first part, Osee relates how, by order of Jahve, he wedded
Gomer, a "wife of fornications", daughter of Debelaim, in order to
have of her "children of fornications":—symbols, on the one hand, of
Israel, the unfaithful spouse who gave to Baal the homage due to Jahve
alone; and, on the other, figures of the children of Israel, who in
the eyes of Jahve, are but adulterous children. The outraged husband
incites the children against their guilty mother, whom he prepares to
punish: while for the children themselves is reserved a fate in
keeping with their origin. The first is named Jezrahel—the reigning
dynasty is about to expiate the blood shed by its ancestor Jehu in the
valley of Jezrahel. The second is a daughter, Lô-Ruhamah,
"disgraced"—Jahve will be gracious no more to his people. The third is
called Lô- 'Ammi, "not my people"—Jahve will no longer recognize the
children of Israel as his people. However, mercy will have the last
word. Osee is commanded to receive Gomer again and to prepare her, by
a temporary retirement, to renew conjugal intercourse—Israel was to
prepare herself in captivity to resume with Jahve the relationship of
husband and wife.
Is the marriage of Osee historical or purely allegorical? The
hypothesis most in favour at present says that the marriage is
historical, and the grounds for it are the obvious sense of the
narrative; the absence of any symbolical sense in the words Gomer and
Debelaim; that the second child is a daughter. It appears to us,
however, with Davidson (Hastings, "Dict. of the Bible", II, 421 sqq.)
and Van Hoonacker, that the first reason is not convincing. A careful
reading of chapters 1-3 discloses the fact that the action is
extremely rapid, that the events are related merely in order to
express a doctrine, and, moreover, they appear to take place within
the single time requisite to one or two speeches. And yet, if these
events are real, a large part of the Prophet's life must have been
spent in these unsavoury circumstances. And again, the names of the
children appear to have been bestowed just at the time that their
meaning was explained to the people. This is especially the case with
regard to the last child: "Call his name, Not my people: for you are
not my people …" Another reason for doubting this hypothesis is that
it is difficult to suppose that God ordered His Prophet to take an
unfaithful wife merely with a view to her being unfaithful and bearing
him adulterous children. And how are we to explain the fact that the
prophet retained her notwithstanding her adultery till after the birth
of the third child, and again received her after she had been in the
possession of another? That the second child was a daughter may be
explained by dramatic instinct, or by some other sufficiently
plausible motive. There remain the names Gomer and Debelaim. Van
Hoonacker proposes as possible translations: consummation (imminent
ruin), doomed to terrible scourges; or top (of perversity), addicted
to the cakes of figs (oblations offered to Baal). Nestle also
translates Bath Debelaim by daughter of the cakes of figs, but in the
sense of a woman to be obtained at a small price (Zeitsch. für
alttest. Wissenschaft, XXIX, 233 seq.). These are but conjectures; the
obscurity may be due to our ignorance. Certain it is at least that the
allegorical meaning, adopted by St. Jerome, satisfies critical
exigencies and is more in conformity with the moral sense. The
doctrinal meaning is identical in either case and that is the only
consideration of real importance.
-- Hegel's method in philosophy consists, therefore, in following out
the triadic development (Entwicklung) in each concept and in each
thing. Thus, he hopes, philosophy will not contradict experience, but
will give to the data of experience the philosophical, that is, the
ultimately true, explanation. If, for instance, we wish to know what
liberty is, we take that concept where we first find it, in the
unrestrained action of the savage, who does not feel the need of
repressing any thought, feeling, or tendency to act. Next, we find
that the savage has given up this freedom in exchange for its
opposite, the restraint, or, as he considers it, the tyranny, of
civilization and law. Thirdly, in the citizen under the rule of law,
we find the third stage of development, namely liberty in a higher and
a fuller Hitler.
--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/>
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>

Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
for eprint oalfy23iak52@hpeprint.com
https://twitter.com/ptusss

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.