Holiday

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

A 50 year battle of voting Rights the United States Supreme Court became Contrary into Racial Gerrymandering in its recent decision of Section 4

The court did not rule on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the
preclearance requirement itself, which requires those affected states
to have changes to their voting laws cleared by the Justice Department
or a federal court in Washington, D.C., before they go into effect.
Rather, the court ruled that the current formula that determines which
states are covered by Section 5 is unconstitutional, effectively
eliminating Section 5 enforcement, at least for the time being.

"In the Court's view, the very success of §5 of the Voting Rights Act
demands its dormancy," Ginsburg wrote.

She said in her bench statement that in renewing Section 5 in 2006,
Congress "found that 40 years has not been a sufficient amount of time
to eliminate the vestiges of discrimination following nearly 100 years
of disregard for the 15th Amendment."

The provision has proven "enormously successful" in increasing
minority registration and access to the ballot and preventing a
"return to old ways," Ginsburg said. Even in jurisdictions where
discrimination may not be overt, "subtle methods" have emerged to
diminish minority turnout, such as racial gerrymandering.

--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/>
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>

Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
https://twitter.com/ptusss

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.