IRS SOURCE post from Goldland Abstracts is in no way a Notice of Tax but is Assesor and or Real Estate Value of Property of Jagendra Prasad, etal,,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: guy perea <guyperea1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:00:25 +0800
Subject: IRS SOURCE post from Goldland Abstracts is in no way a Notice
of Tax but is Assesor and or Real Estate Value of Property of Jagendra
Prasad, etal,,
To: jiki283mofo@post.wordpress.com

In search of Records of Name as related to SHANTI PRASAD a Family
within India and The United States in such Summary of Abstract by
Goldland Abstracts Control Number 14112769481 in following record is
no means a full identification of individual Source of Tax nor a
acting within Source collection of Revenue such as Internal Revenue
Service purpose of value is for assistance in of Tenants to get water
at property in half ownership at 735 S 9th Street Modesto California
of Owners Jagendra Prasad and Sumntra D Prasad of Parcel number
038-018-008-000 Stanislaus County California in same name source
include Jagendra Prasad and Shanti Prasad value of Real Estate in Post
$302,435 San Bruno California and with 735 S 9th Street Modesto
California $539,029 of two value within RICO to Enterprise into proper
LLC to next Name Source to Commonwealth State of Virginia in Medical
Doctor is same Source to Shanti Prasad Jain vs The Director Of
Enforcement on 19 April, 1962
Supreme Court of India Shanti Prasad Jain vs The Director Of
Enforcement on 19 April, 1962 Equivalent citations ... Bench: Aiyyar,
T Venkatarama PETITIONER: SHANTI PRASAD JAIN Vs. RESPONDENT: THE
DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/04/1962 Supreme Court of
India - Cites 15 - Cited by 101 - 1962 AIR 1764
Shanti Prasad Jain And Another vs Director Of Enforcement, Foreign...
on 4 October, 1962
Supreme Court of India Shanti Prasad Jain And Another vs DirectorOf
Enforcement, Foreign ... on 4 October, 1962 Equivalent citations...
Supl. (1) 514 Bench: Wanchoo, K.N. PETITIONER: SHANTI PRASAD JAIN AND
ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT: DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, FOREIGN EXCHANGE
Supreme Court of India - Cites 8 - Cited by 9 - 1964 AIR 1023
Shanti Prasad Jain vs Kalinga Tubes Ltd. And Ors. on 20 November, 1961
Orissa High Court Shanti Prasad Jain vs Kalinga Tubes Ltd. And Ors.on
20 November, 1961 Equivalent citations ... Barman ORDER S. Barman, J.
1. Sri Shanti Prasad Jain , an industrialist and financier,--who until
lately was Chairman Orissa High Court - Cites 49 - Citedby 4 - AIR
1962 Ori 202 - S Barman
Shriyans Prasad Jain vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors. on 9 September, 1976
Bombay High Court Shriyans Prasad Jain vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors.
on 9 September, 1976 Equivalent citations: 1977 CriLJ Bombay High
Court - Cites 48 - Cited by 2 - 1977 CriLJ 1270 - Deshmukh
The State Of Maharashtra vs Shanti Prasad Jain on 29 September, 1977
Bombay High Court The State Of Maharashtra vs Shanti Prasad Jain on 29
September, 1977 Equivalent citations: (1979) 81 BOMLR ... Bench of
this Court is reported in Shriyans Prasad v. Shanti Prasad Bombay High
Court - Cites 46 - Cited by 1 - (1979) 81 BOMLR 184 - Deshmukh
Kalinga Tubes Ltd. And Ors. vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors. on 18 April, 1963
High Court Kalinga Tubes Ltd. And Ors. vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors.
on 18 April, 1963 Equivalent citations ... appeal arises out of an
application by Sri Shanti Prasad Jain under Sections Orissa High Court
- Cites 25 - Citedby 1 - AIR 1963 Ori 189 - Misra
Shriyans Prasad Jain vs Shanti Prasad Jain on 9 September, 1976
Bombay High Court Shriyans Prasad Jain vs Shanti Prasad Jain on 9
September, 1976 Equivalent citations: (1977) 79 BOMLR Bombay High
Court - Cites 59 - Cited by 0 - (1977) 79 BOMLR 394 - Deshmukh
Shanti Prasad Jain vs State on 29 September, 1971
Delhi High Court Shanti Prasad Jain vs State on 29 September, 1971
Author: S Rangarajan Bench: S Rangarajan JUDGMENT ... Shital Prasad
Jain (A-10 brother's son of S. P. Jain , A-3). S. P. Jain Delhi High
Court - Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - S Rangarajan
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Sahu Jain Ltd. on 14 March, 1969
father, Shri Shanti Prasad Jain . ShriAlok Prakash Jain was also a
minor son of Shri Shanti Prasad Jain holding ... case, inasmuch as
Shri Shanti Prasad Jain , Shrimati Rama Jain and Shri Ashok Kumar Jain
wereacting in concert Patna High Court - Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - 1970
76 ITR 628 Patna - S Misra
Krishna Chandra Agarwalla And ... vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors. on 15
December, 1980
Calcutta High Court Krishna Chandra Agarwalla And ... vs Shanti Prasad
Jain And Ors. on 15 December, 1980 Equivalent citations Calcutta High
Court - Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - AIR 1981 Cal 199 - P Khastgir From
lacking water violate United Nations Rule of Law allows The United
States Internal Revenue Service to Audit such Source for violation
against Humanity.

--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/>
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://apps.facebook.com/faceblogged/?uid=1340855784
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://cmt1.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/guyperea
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>

Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
https://plus.google.com/100487463984952448443
https://twitter.com/presidentus1



--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/>
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://apps.facebook.com/faceblogged/?uid=1340855784
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://cmt1.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/guyperea
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>

Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
https://plus.google.com/100487463984952448443
https://twitter.com/presidentus1