What Security protection does a Citizen have with Ceritified Mail when anyone can sign for it?

mailing to a residential address and no one is home, a delivery
reminder slip is to be left in the mailbox by the letter carrier. This
reminder informsthe person a USPS Certified Mail letter is being held
at the local Post Office for pick-up. They mustgo to the Post Office
to Sign for the letter and pick it up. If no one picks up the letter
after 5 to 7 days, USPS will leave a second delivery notice. Again
the delivery slip reminder is left by the letter carrier. Finally
after 5 to 7 days the third and final delivery attempt is made to the
delivery address. After the final notice reminder is left the letter
is taken back to the Post Office and held for 5 to 7 additional days
prior to being returned to the sender with USPS proof of the various
attempts of delivery and notification. This entire time frame can take
17 to 21 days if no one claims the letter. The Green Card Return
Receipt has been the icon of Certified Mail since 1955. This little
Green Card has been difficult for both the sender and the U.S. Postal
Service to manage and store. In July 2001, the U.S. Postal Service
began providing Electronic delivery confirmation available in a PDF
file that provides proof of letter delivery. This information is
collected and authored by The United States Postal Service USPS and
provides the sender 'proof of letter delivery' for USPS Certified
Mail. laws requiring mailers display the proof of the actual Signature
HEARINGS BEFORE A
SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION
________ SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENTS
OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND
RELATED AGENCIES
The FBI is currently investigating some very serious allegations about
activities by former Commerce Department employees. I realize that
none of this happened on your watch. But every day it seems there are
questions and allegations; allegations that classified documents and
information were removed from the Department by a former employee of
the General Counsel's office; questionable practices on how the
Department handles security clearances, including the most recent
reports of John Huang, who attempted to keep his security clearance,
even after he left the Department. And for unknown reasons, he did
keep his security clearance for almost a year after he left the
Department. As I say these did not happen on your watch, but it is
important that we understand your policy towards these kinds of
things. So, that the question of people leaving with any sort of
information gathered during their tenure in the Department has to be
addressed. I even asked for a review of the security procedures that
apply to the employees of the Department of Commerce. I've asked the
head of one of our units to take a look at this, along with our
General Counsel, to make sure that our programs and our policies
prevent such actions from occurring in the future. I have the same
concern you do about such actions. About 4,500 to some degree or
another have security clearance. Why do so many need to have access to
that data? For example, some are trade specialists who have to have
knowledge of what's going on in the world. Again, there are
different levels of security. I don't have a breakdown in front of me
as to what levels of approval they've received. But there are
satellite experts and a number of others. We denied Russia's request
because evidence did not demonstrate that prices and costs in Russia
adequately reflected market considerations. The Ukrainian steel plate
investigation is still ongoing and we are still evaluating the
request, with a preliminary decision due in June. Also, in the steel
plate investigation, the Russian government initially indicated it
wanted economy status, then stated for purposes of this case only, it
was not pushing the issue. security clearance and the information flow
issues. demeans the coin of the realm when we're talking about secret
information as having too much of it or about too few people having
access, and that sortof becomes an every day matter. that is all the
way down to people who are cleared for confidential issues, maybe even
thelocation of the bathroom. To the outsider, when you're told or you
hear that someone has a security clearance, they generally think that
you have a great degree of accessibilityto gather secret information,
some of which may not be a secret as the outsiders think. I do not
believe that we have a security problem until signing for The United
States Trade Secrets by anyone of Certified Mail.

--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/2012/08/proof-of-weather-spotter-qualify.html
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://apps.facebook.com/faceblogged/?uid=1340855784
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/guyperea
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>

Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau of as
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
https://plus.google.com/100487463984952448443
https://twitter.com/presidentus1
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/2012/03/march-19-2012-rules-federal-swordfish_18.html