Sunday, August 17, 2014

What the 2nd Amendment and Roe v. Wade Mean in Alabama that Ferguson Missouri

The long ride that Mr. Obama made 3 Hours 52 minutes could have
transverse from Northwest Alabama for events that were viewed The
"New" Pink Panthers along the coast while his wife was doing speaking
tour's while Mr Obama was babysitter is the New look by Alabama for
Mr. Obama inside problem with his wife's daughter being late of
cuddles with a panther down in coast of Alabama which overall lowered
gas prices at Race Track stations of what Florida knows at the Gates
of Hell commonly called Saint Peter's Gate cooler lately like a berg
leaves all to wonder about the "Huff" Article; The right to bear arms,
as stated in the 2nd Amendment and defined by the SCOTUS in the Heller
and McDonald cases, got a boost last week from the most unlikely
source -- an abortion-rights case in Alabama where Federal District
Court Judge Myron Thompson struck down a 2013 law that would have made
it extremely difficult for women to receive abortion services unless
they were able to travel long distances from home, thereby creating an
undue burden and nullifying the right to an abortion guaranteed by Roe
Vs. Wade.

The new law, similar to a measure that was voided in Mississippi,
required physicians who performed abortions to be granted credentials
in neighboring hospitals, but such credentials are only granted to
physicians who live and practice within a limited distance of the
particular hospital. Three of the five abortion clinics in Alabama are
currently staffed by physicians who reside in other states and travel
to Alabama for the purpose of administering scheduled abortions.
Hence, they could not receive hospital credentials and therefore could
not operate their abortion clinics.

Judge Thompson heard testimony from numerous witnesses representing
both the State of Alabama and the abortion providers, and nearly all
of the 172-page decision is a very careful summary of what was said by
parties on both sides. Ultimately the weight of the testimony
convinced the jurist that by reducing the number of abortion clinics
from five to just two, the State was effectively blocking access to an
abortion and therefore could not be reconciled with the rights of
women to terminate their pregnancies as stipulated in Roe vs. Wade.

You have to wade through almost the entire decision, however, before
you come to the point where women in Alabama seeking an abortion find
themselves making common cause with Alabama residents who want to own
a gun. To quote Judge Thompson: "At its core, each protected right is
held by the individual: the right to decide to have an abortion and
the right to have and use firearms for self-defense. With this
parallelism in mind, the court poses the hypothetical that suppose the
government the government were to implement a new restriction on who
may sell firearms and ammunition, and further, only two vendors in the
State of Alabama were capable of complying with the restriction. The
defenders of this law would be called upon to do a heck of a lot of
explaining -- and rightly so in the face of an effect so severe."

Last year Alabama also passed a new gun law that made it easier for
residents to receive a concealed-carry license and also allowed for
concealed-carry of handguns into certain public events. Alabama has
always been a gun-rich state, with per capita gun ownership well above
the national norm. Now I can't imagine there would ever be as many
women in Alabama seeking an abortion as there might be folks looking
to buy guns. But even though Judge Thompson was educated at Yale, he's
Crimson Tide through and through. Abortion might not be a popular
issue in an evangelical state, but when explained as a parallel to the
2nd Amendment, all those God-fearing, Bible-thumpin' gun owners may
just agree that what works for one side should work for the other.

But Thompson's decision is also a case in point for the folks who want
more controls over guns. Because ultimately in order to make their
case for more gun control, people who don't own guns are going to have
to figure out how to talk to people who do. The last few pages of
Judge Taylor's decision should be required reading for Brady, the NRA
and all the advocates for or against guns. Sometimes people who face
off on opposite sides of an issue may have more in common than they
think.

--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata Weatherdata http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
NAS BLYND
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nas-blynd
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication Commission
http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/ Ambassador Chevy Chase;
Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal; https://twitter.com/ptusss

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.