---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: guy perea <guyperea1@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Subject: Additional Information
To: libarez@venterraliving.com
You will note there is a investigation concerning Disfranchised of
voters in Florida due lack of decease Corpus in to authorization the
removal of Right to Housing in further information to me be in
compliance of law; So we can have a understanding in The following is
based on Right to Vote which based on our Jurisdiction at time of
registration to Act as a Citizen such as a Housing if such is denied
then a violation of the Right to Liberty and such as I am a Registered
voter and seal Certificate then Compliance to your conventional view
of Pinealls County and State of Florida shall come inline of
following:
The ratification of this Amendment was the outcome of
increasing popular dissatisfaction with the operation of the
originally established method of electing Senators. As the
franchise became exercisable by greater numbers of people, the
belief became widespread that Senators ought to be popularly
elected in the same manner as Representatives. Acceptance of
this idea was fostered by the mounting accumulation of evidence
of the practical disadvantages and malpractices attendant upon
legislative selection, such as deadlocks within legislatures
resulting in vacancies remaining unfilled for substantial
intervals, the influencing of legislative selection by corrupt
political organizations and special interest groups through
purchase of legislative seats, and the neglect of duties by
legislators as a consequence of protracted electoral contests.
Prior to ratification, however, many States had perfected
arrangements calculated to afford the voters more effective
control over the selection of Senators. State laws were amended
so as to enable voters participating in primary elections to
designate their preference for one of several party candidates
for a senatorial seat, and nominations unofficially effected
thereby were transmitted to the legislature. Although their
action rested upon no stronger foundation that [sic] common
understanding, the legislatures generally elected the winning
candidate of the majority, and, indeed, in two States, candidates
for legislative seats were required to promise to support,
without regard to party ties, the senatorial candidate polling
the most votes. As a result of such developments, at least 29
States by 1912, one year before ratification, were nominating
Senators on a popular basis, and, as a consequence, the
constitutional discretion of the legislatures had been reduced
to little more than that retained by presidential electors./1
Very shortly after ratification it was established that if a
person possessed the qualifications requisite for voting for a
Senator, his right to vote for such an officer was not derived
merely from the constitution and laws of the State in which they
are chosen but had its foundation in the Constitution of the
United States./2 Consistent with this view, federal courts
declared that when local party authorities, acting pursuant to
regulations prescribed by a party's state executive committee,
refused to permit a ....., on account of his ...., to vote in a
primary to select candidates for the office of U.S. Senator, they
deprived him of a right secured to him by the Constitution and
laws, in violation of this Amendment./3 An Illinois statute, on
the other hand, which required that a petition to form, and to
nominate candidates or, a new political party be signed by at
least 25,000 voters from at least 50 counties was held not to
impair any right under the Seventeenth Amendment, notwithstanding
that 52 percent of the State's voters were residents of one
county, 87 percent were residents of 49 counties, and only 13
percent resided in the 53 least populous counties./4
On Friday, July 11, 2014, guy perea <guyperea1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The conviction was more then 10 year's it's been since 1999 the year is 2014 that's today and the since 1999 is 15 years
>
> Guy Perea Presidential Elector President of The United States
>
> On Jul 11, 2014 4:58 PM, "Cori Stover - The Reserve at Lake Pointe
Well, just so there is no misunderstanding's, our qualifications when
it comes to criminal background is "Any felony conviction within 10
years will result in immediate rejection of application for residency.
Your application for residency will be also rejected for any of the
following criminal related reasons, regardless of whether or not jail
time was served or adjudication was withheld or time limits,
>>
>> -Any crime against a person or a persons property
>>
>> -any prostitution related conviction
>>
>> -Any sex related conviction
>>
>> -A listing as a sexual predator or offender
>>
>> -Any terrorist related conviction
>>
>> -Any cruelty to animals related conviction
>>
>> If any of those apply to the charges from 1999, then unfortuneately I highly reccommend not applying. If not, then I'd be happy to assist you with any further questions.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Cori
>> How long ago was and what was the felony for? That may be the only thing that would hold you up. We have no problem with the small dog, as long as it's under 30lbs, it's a one-time pet fee of $300. We also offer lease terms up to as long as 18 months.
>>
>> Cori
>>
>>
>>
>> Click an option
>> below to respond
>>
>>
>>
>> 5800 Lynn Lake Drive South - St. Petersburg, FL 33712
>> Phone: Call Us - Fax: (727) 866-3979
>>
>>
>>
>> View disclaimer - Click here to unsubscribe
>>
>> From: guyperea1@gmail.com
>> To: reservelakepointefl@researchapartments.com
>> Sent: 7/11/2014 10:07:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: The Reserve at Lake Pointe Apartments is pet friendly
>>
>> I have no Credit but a good income at two and half times they want 30,000 in total investment but with Retirement VA and Social Security and Stocks I have that also I am a pass felon and Discharged from State of California and Register with FDLE and County so I'm in full Compliance also I have a small pet I live alone I'm 64 year's old on Medicare and VA if I get sick and looking for a lease for at least a year monthly 600 to 650 let me know what you have
On 8/27/14, libarez@venterraliving.com <libarez@venterraliving.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your interest in Calais Park Lofts.
> Please find attached information we discussed.
>
> Regards,
> Linda Ibarez-Hernandez
>
> Find us on [image: Facebook] at www.facebook.com/VenterraRealty.
>
> Check out our YouTube Channel at www.youtube.com/VenterraRealty.
>
> This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law or may constitute attorney work product. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or
> (ii) delete this message immediately if an electronic communication.
--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata Weatherdata http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
NAS BLYND
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nas-blynd
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication Commission
http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/ Ambassador Chevy Chase;
Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal; https://twitter.com/ptusss
--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata Weatherdata http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY QICP
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
NAS BLYND
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nas-blynd
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication Commission
http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/ Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal; https://twitter.com/ptusss
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.